A diatribe consisting of pure trash by a trash so-called Shaykh Zubayr of Pakistan, captioned: The Differing Principles of the Deobandis with the Ahlul Hadeeth / Salafees, has been brought to our attention. Although the diatribe of the trash shaykh is overloaded with slandering trash against the Ulama of Deoband, and really does not befit an intelligent response, we deem it prudent to respond and to refute the trash which could be misleading for the ignorant and unwary.
This shaykh Zubayr is indeed a jaahil of the worst kind. His trash comments regarding the beliefs and practices of the Ulama of Deoband testify to his compound jahaalat. He is undoubtedly a disgusting moron masquerading as a sheikh. Slandering the Ulama of Deoband, this moron ‘shaykh’ avers:
“…the Deobandees are a sect deeply engrossed in the heretical beliefs of Soofism and in showing blind partisanship to Imaam Abu Haneefah….”
Then he stupidly lists 14 issues on which the Ulama differ with the Ahl-e-Hadith sect. Insha-Allah, the trash shall be adequately debunked in this article. The trash shaykh has miserably failed to understand the beliefs and practices of the Ulama of Deoband. His slander is based on pure jahaalat aggravated by enmity for the Muqallideen of Imaam Abu Hanifah (Rahmatullah alayh).
All the trash accusations and slanders of the trash moron shaykh are baseless, devoid of truth and Shar’i substance as shall be shown in these pages, Insha-Allah.
SLANDERING THE
ULAMA OF DEOBAND
By:
The Majlis
PO Box 3393
Port Elizabeth, 6056
South Africa
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
2
INTRODUCTION
A diatribe consisting of pure trash by a trash so-called
Shaykh Zubayr of Pakistan, captioned: The Differing
Principles of the Deobandis with the Ahlul Hadeeth /
Salafees, has been brought to our attention. Although
the diatribe of the trash shaykh is overloaded with
slandering trash against the Ulama of Deoband, and
really does not befit an intelligent response, we deem
it prudent to respond and to refute the trash which
could be misleading for the ignorant and unwary.
This shaykh Zubayr is indeed a jaahil of the worst
kind. His trash comments regarding the beliefs and
practices of the Ulama of Deoband testify to his
compound jahaalat. He is undoubtedly a disgusting
moron masquerading as a sheikh. Slandering the
Ulama of Deoband, this moron ‘shaykh’ avers:
“…the Deobandees are a sect deeply engrossed in the
heretical beliefs of Soofism and in showing blind
partisanship to Imaam Abu Haneefah….”
Then he stupidly lists 14 issues on which the Ulama
differ with the Ahl-e-Hadith sect. Insha-Allah, the
trash shall be adequately debunked in this article. The
trash shaykh has miserably failed to understand the
beliefs and practices of the Ulama of Deoband. His
slander is based on pure jahaalat aggravated by enmity
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
3
for the Muqallideen of Imaam Abu Hanifah
(Rahmatullah alayh).
All the trash accusations and slanders of the trash
moron shaykh are baseless, devoid of truth and Shar’i
substance as shall be shown in these pages, Insha-
Allah.
Declaring the Ulama and Auliya of Deoband to be
kaafir, the Trash shaykh zubair who is an agent of
Iblees said in his rubbish talk:
“We do not hold it permissible to pray Salaah behind
their Imaams, nor will we ever give them a chance to
come to our Masaajid and propagate their filthy
beliefs…”
This is the trash opinion of the Trash jaahil shaykhus
shaitaan.
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
4
THE AHL-E-HADITH/SALAFI SECT
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that his
Ummah will be split into 73 sects. Of these 73 sects,
only one will be on the Sunnah, The rest are doomed
for Jahannam. The Ahl-e-Hadith/Salafi sect is one of
these doomed deviate sects which have abandoned the
Sunnah.
The disease of all these baatil sects is that while they
proclaim themselves to be followers of the Sunnah,
they submit the Qur’aan and Ahaadith to their
whimsical fancies and personal interpretations. Thus,
even a total jaahil laymen who lacks proper
knowledge of even the method of Istinja deems
himself capable of interpreting Hadith.
These deviant characters have absolutely no regard for
the illustrious Aimma-e-Mujtahideen of the Khairul
Quroon era – the Aimmah who derive their authority
from Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). They
will ridicule and reject the views and teachings of the
Aimmah Mujtahideen to follow Ibn Taimiyyah who
appeared on the Islamic scene almost six centuries
after Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
While they denounce Taqleed of the Aimmah-e-
Mujtahideen who were either the Students of the
Sahaabah or the Students of the Taabieen Fuqaha, they
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
5
(the moron deviates of the Ahl-e-Hadith sect) expect
Muslims to latch on to the taqleed of their Imaam Ibn
Taimiyyah and the like. The convolution of their
brains is indeed most lamentable.
The Sunnah is ensconced in the confines of the Four
Math-habs – Hanafi, Maaliki, Shaafi’ and Hambali.
During the initial stages of Islam, there were many
other Math-habs of the Sunnah and Haqq. However, in
the passage of time, all the other Math-habs faded into
oblivion. Now only the Four very prominent Math-
habs of the Sunnah remain.
Ibn Taimiyyah was a late-comer. He arrived on the
Islamic stage very very late – six centuries after the
inception of this Deen. It is sheer jahaalat and
contumacy to substitute the intelligent Taqleed of the
Math-habs of the illustrious Aimmah who flourished
in close proximity to the era of Rasulullah (Sallallahu
alayhi wasallam), for adopting the silly taqleed of
someone
who
appeared
many
centuries
after
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
The Ahl-e-Hadith deviates excel in this stupidity – the
stupidity of abandoning the superior Taqleed of the
Math-habs for the taqleed of Ibn Taimiyyah. The term
Ahl-e-Hadith adopted by these deviates is a misnomer.
They have drifted far from the Straight Path of the
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
6
Sunnah. They are better termed Ahl-e-Hawa (The
People of Base Desire).
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
7
THE CONCEPT OF WAHDATUL
WUJOOD
The first item on the trash shaykh’s trash list of
slanders is Wahdatul Wujood. On this issue,
slandering the Ulama of Deoband, the trash, moron
shaykh Zubayr alleges:
“So dear Muslim you have come to know that the
Deobandees belief in the concept of Wahdatul Wujood
necessitates Hulool, which is for Allah to dwell in all
things and to be part of them, and this is a belief that
has been innovated by them.
So we come to know from this statement that the
concept propagated and defended is that Allaah is
indwelling in everything that is existent and
being…..And for Allaah to be in everything and
everywhere, necessitates Hulool which is the prime
essence of the concept of Wahdatul Wujood.”
Then compounding his jahaalat and slander with
more stupidity, the trash shaykh says:
“After knowing this, let us refer to the lexicons to
understand
what
Wahdatul
Wujood
means
linguistically. The explanation that can be found
regarding this is:
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
8
„Whatever exists in the entire universe, it has no
existence, and whatever exists then it is none other
than Allaah.‟
This means that everything that is visible to the naked
eye is nothing but Allaah; there is no distinction
between the creator and the creation.”
This rubbish theory of kufr and shirk is the fabrication
of the satanically convoluted brains of the trash
shaykh. He has disgorged what Iblees has urinated
into his brains. The belief stated by the trash shaykh
and which he slanderously attributes to the Akaabir
Ulama of Deoband is shirk which expels such a
satanic believer from the fold of Islam. Not a single
Aalim of Deoband ever ascribed to the shirk
contended by the moron.
This shirk is not the belief of the Ulama of Deoband.
It is a monstrous shaitaani slander against our
illustrious senior Ulama of Deoband who were the
Standard Bearers of the Sunnah. They devoted their
entire lives to combat Bid’ah and Shirk. Now comes
this trash moron shaykh hurling such vile slander
against them.
He cites statements taken out of their context from the
writings of our Akaabir, and he compounds his
intellectual
villainy
with
ignorance.
Without
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
9
understanding
the
meaning
of
the
technical
terminology of Wahdatul Wujood the moron searching
in some lexicon finds a meaning which he slaps on to
our Akaabir accusing them of believing in the shirk
stated by some lexicon.
He has miserably failed to present the meaning of
Wahdatul Wujood as understood and explained by the
Akaabir of Deoband. Ignorant of the meaning of the
Sufi technical term, the trash shaykh referred to some
lexicon/dictionary for the meaning. Thus presenting
the lexicon meaning, he says:
“After knowing this, let us refer to the lexicons to
understand
what
Wahdatul
Wujood
means
linguistically. The explanation that can be found
regarding this is:
„Whatever exists in the entire universe, it has no
existence, and whatever exists then it is none other
than Allaah.‟
This means that everything that is visible to the naked
eye is nothing but Allaah; there is no distinction
between the creator and the creation.”
On the basis of a lexicon, the moron shaykh claims
that the Akaabir of Deoband believe in the kufr/shirk
of hulool (incarnation). If this agent of Iblees had any
respect for the truth, and if his desire was to ascertain
the beliefs of the Ulama of Deoband, he would have
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
10
resorted to the Ulama and question them regarding
their beliefs on the issues which he is either in doubt
of, or totally ignorant.
Ask any Aalim of Deoband for his belief in this
regard. The invariable answer will be that the lexicon
meaning of Wahdatul Wujood so stupidly and
contumaciously proffered by the trash moron shaykh
is kufr and shirk. He will not find a single Aalim of
Deoband believing in the kufr/shirk concept presented
by the jaahil shaykh.
With the lexicon meaning of the concept, he makes
tafseer of some statements of the Akaabir Ulama –
statements which he has miserably failed to
understand. If the shirk ‘lexicon’ concept was the
belief of the Ulama of Deoband, then all the products
of Darul Uloom Deoband would have subscribed to it.
But, the moron will not find a single Deobandi Aalim
subscribing to the shirk with which he slanders our
Akaabir Ulama and Auliya.
To gain an understanding of a concept, it is necessary
to seek its meaning from its adherents, not to stupidly
seek a ‘fatwa’ from a lexicon, then accuse others of
ascribing to the lexicon meaning.
Wahdatul Wujood means absolutely nothing other
than Qurb-e-Ilaahi of an extremely lofty level. It
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
11
means closeness and nothing more. The accusation of
hulool (incarnation) is vile slander. It does not mean
unity of existence – that all creation of Allah Ta’ala is
abstract and have no reality. How could it ever be
possible for the Akaabir Ulama to believe that Allah
Ta’ala has not created real beings and entities when
everything we see and touch is real. The Qur’aan
states that Allah Ta’ala is the Khaaliq of all creation
(makhlooq). Only an insane person will claim that he
himself is an abstract idea in his abstract brains which
have no real existence, and that he, himself has no real
existence.
Did this moron shaykh Zubayr ever cross the path of a
Deobandi Aalim who professed the belief of shirk
with which he slanders our Akaabir Ulama and
Auliya? If such a satanic belief of shirk was among
the Aqaa-id of our Ulama, surely it would have
surfaced in all Deobandi Madaaris and their products.
But not a single Product of Ilm who emerged from any
such Madaaris subscribes to the shirk excreted by this
trash shaykh.
Some issues are metaphorically expressed. The
Qur’aan Majeed itself employs allegory, metaphor and
figuratives of speech to describe many issues which
are not literally comprehensible to us. The Hand, Eye,
etc. of Allah Azza Wa Jal are metaphoric expressions.
But the Salafi anthropomorphists stupidly ascribe to
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
12
the kufr of bodily / physical limbs, etc. for Allah Azza
Wa Jal – Nauthubillaah! They have cordoned off
Allah Azza Wa Jal in a created space – created by
Allah Azza Wa Jal.
While
they
are
guilty
of
the
kufr
of
anthropomorphism, they slander the Akaabir Ulama of
Deoband with falsehood which their ignorance have
constrained them to understand is the belief of the
Ulama of Deoband. While the moron trash shaykh
correctly attributes Wahdatul Wujood to the Ulama of
Deoband, he searched for its meaning in a lexicon. It
is like saying that Muslims believe in Salaat, but then
he searches for the meaning of Salaat in a lexicon.
Then he ascribes the literal meaning of salaat to
Muslims while this meaning has no relationship with
the Shar’i method of Salaat. In this regard he avers:
“After knowing this, let us refer to the lexicons to
understand
what
Wahdatul
Wujood
means
linguistically.”
From this „linguistic‟ meaning, the moron concluded
that the Ulama of Deoband subscribe to the shirk of
hulool. He has miserably failed to provide evidence
for his false accusation, namely, that the Wahdatul
Wujood concept of the Ulama of Deoband implies
hulool, and that entire creation is non-existent.
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
13
The term only means extreme nearness to Allah
Ta’ala. In fact, this very concept of extreme nearness
described as Wahdatul Wujood is based on the Hadith.
Narrating a Hadith-e-Qudsi, Hadhrat Abu Hurairah
(Radhiyallahu anhu) said:
“Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that
Allah Ta‟ala said: „My servant continues gaining My
Proximity by means of Nawaafil until I love him.
Then, when I love him I become his ears with which he
hears; (and I become) his eyes with which he sees;
(and I become) his hand with which he touches; (and I
become) his feet with which he walks. If he asks Me
(anything), I assuredly award it to him…”
Thus, this is the Wahdatul Wujood of the Ulama of
Deoband, and nothing more. Every concept spun
around this term by deviates is baatil and mardood.
Now what does the moron say and how does he
explain the concept of Wahdatul Wujood stated in this
authentic Hadith narrated by Imaam Bukhaari
(Rahmatullah alayh)?
Here the Hadith Qudsi informs us that Allah Ta’ala
becomes the ears, eyes, hands and feet of his created
servant. If any person propounds on the basis of this
Hadith that Allah Ta’ala and his creation is one and
the same entity and that there is no differentiation
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
14
between Khaaliq and Makhlooq, then the moron
deviate can be justifiably branded a mushrik and
charged with the belief of hulool.
Despite the literal sense of the Hadith implying hulool,
its real meaning is never hulool. The moron shaykh
has ascribed his own convoluted and corrupt meaning
to the statements of the Ulama who had expressed
Divine Proximity in terms similar to that mentioned in
the Ahaadith.
Creation’s existence being nothing only means that its
existence is dependent on the Existence of Allah Azza
Wa Jal, The One and Only Khaaliq. It never means
that creation has no existence or it is a hallucination.
In fact, even the reality of hallucination is reliant on a
tangible, physical existing creation, namely the human
being. Without this real created being, even a dream /
hallucination cannot exist.
Thus, the existence of a dream is reliant on the
existence of the person who dreams. In a similar way,
man’s existence and the existence of all creation are
reliant on the Existence of Allah Ta’ala. This reliance
does not merge the creation with the Creator into a
single entity. It is only a convoluted brain that
conjectures such rubbish shirk.
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
15
In another Hadith also narrated by Hadhrat Abu
Hurairah (Radhiyallahu anhu), it is mentioned that on
the Day of Qiyaamah, Allah Ta’ala will say to
someone:
“O Son of Aadam! I was sick, but you did not visit
Me.‟ The person will say: „O my Rabb! How could I
visit You whilst you are Rabbul Aalameen?‟ Allah
Azza Wa Jal will say: „Did you not know that a certain
servant of Mine was sick and you had not visited him?
Did you not know that if you had visited him, you
would have found Me by him?‟
„O Son of Aadam! I had asked you for food, but you
did not feed Me.‟ The person will say: „O my Rabb!
How could I feed You whilst You are Rabbul
Aalameen?‟ Allah Azza Wa Jal will say: „Did you not
know that if you had fed a certain servant of Mine, you
would have found it by Me?‟
„O Son of Aadam! I had asked water from you to
drink, but you did not give Me water.‟ The person will
say: „O my Rabb! How could I give you water to drink
whilst You are Rabbul Aalameen?‟ Allah Azza Wa Jal
will say: „A certain servant of Mine had asked you for
water, but you had not given him water. Did you not
know that if you had given him water you would have
found it by Me?”
(Muslim Shareef)
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
16
Now what does the moron trash shaykh understand
from this Hadith and what wahdatul wujood concept
will he attribute to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi
wasallam) for having mentioned these aspects of
Divine Proximity in different narrations? In these
Hadith narrations, Allah Ta’ala expresses His Unity
with His created servants. Allah Azza Wa Jal
explicitly emphasizes that He becomes the eyes, ears
and limbs of His servant. Is this hulool? Yes,
according to the satanically convoluted brains of the
trash shaykh it is „hulool‟.
While he is unable to directly slander Rasulullah
(Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) with the satanic charge of
hallucinated hulool, he has the satanic temerity of
directing the slander at the Representatives of
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), namely the
Akaabir Ulama and Auliya of Deoband. He is like the
Mushrikeen of Arabia who had slandered and reviled
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) when in
reality their vilification was meant for Allah Azza Wa
Jal. Thus, the Qur’aan Majeed states:
“Verily We know that their statements grieve you. (In
reality) they are not denying you, but the zaalimeen
are denying the Aayaat of Allah.”
(Al-An‟aam, Aayat 33)
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
17
Wahdatul Wujood according to the Ulama of Deoband
means absolutely nothing other than an extremely
lofty stage of Divine Proximity (Qurb). But the moron
shaykh is too dense in his vermiculated brains to
differentiate between Qurb and hulool.
The arguments the moron proffers for his hulool
slander are exceedingly stupid and utterly baseless. He
quotes from a book then subjects the quote to his
stupidity to fabricate a hypothesis to suit his
conjectured idea of wahdatul wujood. Citing from
Imdaadul
Mushtaaq
of
Haaji
Imdaadullah
(Rahmatullah alayh), the trash shaykh says:
“Some of the things that happen at the two holy
mosques are wonderful and pleasing. The concept of
Wahdatul Wujood is exceedingly commissioned
amongst the people. When I visited Masjidul Qubaa at
Madeenah I saw a man that was indulged in sweeping
the floors. After I had finished visiting the mosque
(leaving the mosque), and was intending to wear my
shoes I heard him say, „Yaa Allaah. Yaa Mawjood‟
and there was another person who was present
outside the mosque and he was saying, „He (Allaah) is
everywhere (and present in everything). After hearing
him I perceived another transient inward state.”
This episode is the moron’s „daleel‟ for the hulool
slander and for his corrupt idea of the meaning of
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
18
Wahdatul Wujood. Not a single word in the
aforegoing citation even remotely suggests what the
moron shaykh has slandered.
Noteworthy is the comment: „and present in
everything‟. The Trash shaykh has enclosed this
statement in brackets because it is NOT the comment
of Hadhrat Haaji Imdaadullah (Rahmatullah alayh). It
is the fabrication excreted by the Trash shaykh. Haaji
Imdaadullah (Rahmatullah alayh) did not say that
Allah Ta’ala „is present in everything‟. The moron
shaykh compounds his own slander with his own
corrupt comments which he presents in a deceptive
manner to create the understanding that the statement
of shirk is actually the belief of our Akaabir Ulama
when in reality it is the excretion of his convoluted
brains.
Haaji Imdaadullah (Rahmatullah alayh) was only
commenting on the vivid perception these people of
Madinah had of the Presence of Allah Ta’ala – that
Allah Ta’ala was ever present in their minds as He
mentions in the Qur’aan:
“He (Allah) is with you wherever you may be.”
(Al-Hadeed, Aayat 4)
What is the hulool concept which such vivid
perception of the Divine Presence conveys? The
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
19
hulool dimension added to this Perception of Allah’s
Presence is the satanic idea of the Trash shaykh.
According to the understanding of the deviate Salafis
– an understanding which the moron shaykh repeats in
his junk talk – the belief of Divine Omnipresence
which is our belief, is shirk since it entails hulool. At
the outset we state unequivocally that the Presence of
Allah Azza Wa Jal everywhere is the belief of the
Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah. We need not go beyond
the Qur’aan Majeed for the proof to substantiate the
belief of the Omnipresence of Allah Azza Wa Jal –
that He is everywhere, NOT in everything as the
moron Trash shaykh slanders.
Allah Ta’ala says in the Qur’aan Majeed:
“He is Allah in the heavens and in the earth.”
(Al-An‟aam, Aayat 3)
“He Who is in the heaven is Allah and He is Allah in
the earth.”
(Az-Zukhruf, Aayat 84)
“He (Allah) is with you wherever you may be.”
(Al-Hadeed, Aayat 4)
“When there is a secret gathering of three, He (Allah)
is the Fourth (present at the meeting). When there are
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
20
five, then He is the Sixth. And when there are less or
more, He is with them wherever they may be….”
(Al-Mujaadalah, Aayat 7)
How is Allah Azza Wa Jal everywhere? That is not
our business nor our concern. The array of
interpretations is of no concern and does not negate
the Divine Omnipresence. It suffices to believe that
Allah Azza Wa Jal is everywhere regardless of the
chagrin of the anthropomorphist deviant juhala
Salafis. Belief in Allah’s Omnipresence requires no
explanation and no interpretation.
We only believe whatever Allah Ta’ala has
proclaimed about Himself in the Qur’aan Majeed. He
says that He is in the heavens, in the earth, on the
Throne and present with us wherever we may be. It is
contumacious and smacks of Imaani deficiency to
enquire the nature and manner of the Omnipresence of
Allah Azza Wa Jal.
Man’s mind is created, hence finite in its reach of
comprehension. It is impossible for a created finite
entity to encompass the eternal, unlimited and
unrestricted Attributes of Allah Azza Wa Jal. Finitude
is not predicated to Allah Azza Wa Jal. Thus, while it
is imperative to believe in the Omnipresence of Allah
Azza Wa Jal, it is forbidden to attempt probing it. The
consequence of probing into this Divine Domain is
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
21
either anthropomorphism of the deviant, ignorant
Salafis or renunciation of Imaan. The Ahlus Sunnah
Wal Jama’ah ensconced in the Four Math-habs is the
one and only safe ground for safeguarding Imaan.
The
moron
Salafis
who
disdain
and
deny
interpretation are swift to resort to interpretation of
these Aayaat in their futile attempt of scrounging for
credibility for their anthropomorphic belief of Allah
Ta’ala being seated on the Throne in a confined
created space. But, they do not extend the same
confounded anthropomorphic logic to these Verses
which explicitly state the Presence of Allah Ta’ala
everywhere. There is no need for us to interpret the
manner of Divine Presence. We say that Allah Ta’ala
is present everywhere because the Qur’aan Majeed
confirms this.
If it is said that omnipresence creates the belief of
hulool, we retort that shaitaan has made hulool into
your brains. Your intellect is diffused with satanism,
hence you seek to deny the Omnipresence of Allah
Azza Wa Jal stated so explicitly in the Qur’aan
Majeed. While the Salafi belief of anthropomorphism
tolerates the presence of Allah Ta’ala in a confined
space on the Throne, it cannot logically extend the
same confounded logic for Omnipresence. It will not
make any sense to any one, hence they are constrained
to resort to interpretation regarding the Aayat
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
22
pertaining to Omnipresence, while they feel no such
constraint regarding their anthropomorphic doctrine
pertaining to the issue of Istiwaa alal Arsh. Hence
they feel confident in believing that Allah Ta’ala is a
fixed Entity sitting on a created physical Throne (the
Arsh).
The meaning of Wahdatul Wujood, described in
different ways by the Sufiya, is correct. The problem
is that the brains of these crass deviant materialists are
incapable of understanding what the Sufis are saying.
These Salafis are stupid and spiritually barren, hence
they are incapable of transcending above their bestial
nafs, leave alone transcending the spiritual realms
leading to the extremely lofty stage of Qurb-e-Ilaahi
mentioned in the aforegoing Ahaadith.
In simple terms readily comprehended by every
Muslim, Wahdatul Wujood only means an exceptional
closeness with Allah Ta’ala to the degree that Allah
Ta’ala Himself said that He becomes the eyes, ears,
and limbs of his Muqarrab servant. The Ahaadith
teach the lesson of Wahdatul Wujood, but the jaahil
Trash shaykh is too dense in his brains to understand
the simple meaning of Wahdatul Wujood stated by
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The very
same meaning mentioned in the Ahaadith is the
concept of the Ulama of Deoband. The only addition
made is the name, Wahdatul Wujood. Nothing has
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
23
been added to the meaning of the concept stated by
Allah Azza Wa Jal Himself in the Hadith.
The Rubbish shaykh inspired by Iblees has not
presented a single statement of our Akaabir to
substantiate his absolutely baseless claim of hulool
and ittihaad (unity of existence). He mentions
statements which only confirm that the Ulama of
Deoband accept the validity of Wahdatul Wujood. But
this is not proof for the charge that they believe in
hulool and ittihaad. We too accept the validity of
Wahdatul Wujood. But the hulool charge is a vile
slander.
Now to understand what is meant by this concept, the
doubters should ask us. But the moron Trash shaykh,
finding no belief of hulool in any of the kutub of our
Akaabir, looked into some lexicon for the meaning.
Then he unjustly, stupidly and contumaciously
charged that the Ulama of Deoband believe in the
lexicon meaning. He is both a Jaahil and a Liar on the
payroll of Iblees.
Searching in a lexicon for the meaning of a concept or
a technical term used by Ulama and Auliya testifies to
the jahaalat of the Trash shaykh.
Every charge which this Trash shaykh has levelled at
the Ulama of Deoband is bereft of evidence. He has
THE SLANDERS OF A TRASH SALAFI SHAYKH
24
miserably failed to present evidence for his LIES from
the kutub of the Ulama of Deoband. He merely makes
a slanderous claim without providing any proof
whatsoever.
Furthermore, he is too stupid to understand the
statements he read in the kutub of the Ulama. He
extracts a statement and gives it his own fanciful
interpretation. Then on the basis of his corrupt
understanding
and
fallacious
interpretation
he
hallucinates slanders against the Ulama of Deoband.
This moron Trash shaykh’s brains are filled with
shaitaaniyat, hence he portrayed shaitaani temerity in
slandering even such great and illustrious Auliya as
Hadhrat Mansur Bin Hallaaj (Rahmatullah alayh) and
Ibn Arabi (Rahmatullah alayh). The vast majority of
Ulama consisting of Fuqaha, Muhadditheen and
Auliya uphold the Imaani and Roohaani integrity of
these two noble Auliya whom this Ibleesi trash shaykh
slanders. This miserable Trash shaykh comes fully
within the purview of the Hadith-e-Qudsi:
“He who is the enemy of My Wali, verily I give him
notice of war.”
0:00--:--
Reproduced from https://themajlis.co.za/books/slanders-of-a-trash-salafi-shaykh/