VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
More in Politics & Current Affairs
BY:
Mujlisul Ulama of SA
PO Box 3393
Port Elizabeth
6056, South Africa
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
2
THEY ARE KAAFIROON
THEY ARE ZAALIMOON
THEY ARE FAASIQOON
SAYS
THE QUR’AAN OF ALLAH REGARDING
THOSE WHO VOTE FOR THE LAW OF
TAAGHOOT
“Those who do not govern according to that
(Shariah) which Allah has revealed,
indeed they are the kaafiroon.”
(Al-Maaidah, Aayat 44)
“Those who do not govern according to that
(Shariah) which Allah has revealed,
indeed they are the zaalimoon.”
(Al-Maaidah, Aayat 45)
“Those who do not govern according to that
(Shariah) which Allah has revealed,
indeed they are the faasiqoon.”
(Al-Maaidah, Aayat 47)
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
3
FATAWA OF THE TURKISH ULAME-E-
HAQQ
By a Turkish Brother
As salamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa
barakatuhu
I will start by introducing myself so that you may
know my background. I am born to Turkish
parents in France, in a big family. My parents
made sure that we grew on the culture of our
original country. As a family we were following
the last Ulamaa of the Ottomans, those
opposing the ideology of the Republic, those
preferring the hard life in prison instead of
reneging from the Deen. There were two or
three of these Ulamaa left, but they died some
20 to 30 years ago.
The Mufti my father was following told his
Jamaat to study Ilm using the old Madrasa
curriculum. For this he explained the Madrasa
text books and put them on tape to be studied at
home. But my father didn‟t obey his directive,
and after some time fell into the Dunya. We as
his children, were not happy to live a life without
a goal, hence we became drowned in the Dunya
using fatwas from modern Ulamaa.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
4
However, we wanted to emerge from this sea of
darkness. But we knew that the majority of the
Ulamaa of Turkey, and not one of them could
help us, as they were from those selling their
Deen. We didn‟t find anyone not tainted by the
ideas and thinking of Freemasonry.
At that time, we learnt about the Deoband
movement and the pure Niyyah that was at its
base. We searched about the modern Deoband
Ulamaa and asked some fatwas on different
subjects. From the Ulamaa we could reach on
internet, we saw that only your fatwas were
according to the soul of the old fatwas. And that
despite your old age you were still in search of
the Haqq without concessions.
Fatwas like sending children to Kaafir schools is
Kufr, or driving for women is Haraam or Jammat
Salaat for women is not Jaiz, were all
corresponding to the old fatwas. We then
decided to rebuild our life around the goal of the
Ridhaa of Allah Azza wa Jall, regardless of it
initially being difficult. We are making Duaa for
you.
However, we saw, from your publications, that
you are not aware of the true nature and goal of
democracy. The Ulamaa that we followed fought
until their last breath against this strongest
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
5
weapon of Dajjal and it‟s Freemasonry. So, we
deemed it our duty to make you aware of this
and the fatwa given about it.
The subject of democracy and its system of vote
has been studied by a great deal of Ulamaa and
many different fatwas were given. But the Haqq
is always one. If we omit the details of each
fatwa, it appears that the Ulamaa are divided in
two opinions: the ones who say that voting is
Haraam like yourself and the ones who say that
voting is Kufr and that it renders the voter a
Mushrik and a Murtadd.
When they first encountered democracy, the
Ulamaa who were on the Jihad front (be it as
fighters or as Ulamaa, every one of them made
a big sacrifice), understood that it is Kufr. The
ones not on the front hesitated and restricted
themselves to only say that it is Haraam.
Because the Qur‟aan says: “As for those who
fight in Our way, We will certainly guide them
onto Our paths, and indeed Allah is with those
who are good in deeds.” v.69 s. العنكبوت 29,
I don't speak of the ones who say that it is
Islamic and a Muslim should vote, as this
opinion is clearly Baatil.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
6
I will quote some of the fatwas of the Ulamaa
viewing democracy as Kufr, Insha‟Allah.
First fatwa by One of the last Ulama of Haqq,
Sheikhul Islam of the Ottoman Khilafah,
Mustafa Sabri Efendi
This fatwa was issued in the 1920's and it is
about the government of M. Kemal, the founder
of the Turkish republic and the Turkish people
who accepted this new rule. The grounds on
which the Fatwa is based are:
1. Removing the Hijab of women from the law
2. Removing division of the inheritance as
ordered by Allah Azza wa Jall from the
law
3. Removing the Shar‟i marriage from the law
4. Removing the Shar‟i divorce from the law
5. Removing the Shar‟i divorce waiting period
(Iddah) from the law
6. Forbidding and preventing polygamy in
practice
7. Allowing marriage between Muslim and non-
Muslim
8. Allowing and encouraging half naked „Muslim‟
women to dance with non-Mahram men in
public
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
7
9. Boasting and saying "I drink wine like this!"
10. Freeing the government of the control and
intervention of the Shar‟e Sharif by separating
the Deen and the state
11. Despite this ayah: "Those who do not judge
according to what Allah has sent down are the
disbelievers.", removing the Islamic laws and
Islamic constitution, applying and preferring the
Swiss civil laws based on old Roman laws.
12. Insulting the Islamic Shariah personally and
in the newspapers
13. Removing the Oath at court in the name of
Allah Azza wa Jall from the law
14. Removing the Article, "The state religion is
Islam" from the constitution
15. Removing religious courses from schools
16. Prohibiting Hifzh of the Qur'an
17. Removing the Arabic script of the Qur'an,
and replacing it with Latin letters
18. Insulting our Rasulullah salla'Allahou aleyhi
wa sellam by saying "The Turkish people can't
be bound by laws devised by (haashaa) a
naked, calved Arab."
Is it Jaaiz that we define as Muslim such
followers that accept and approve of a
government composed of such leaders and
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
8
ministers that are practicing all the above? -
Meaning, accepting the rule of this state.
The answer is: Absolutely not! (meaning they
are Murtadd) "
Jointly authored by:
-One of the last Sheikhul Islam of Ottoman
Khilafah, Mustafa Sabri Efendi
-Mufti of Komotini (Gumulcine in Turkish),
Muhammed Nevzat
Another version of his fatwa with detailed
explanations:
“ If the State, goes out of the bounds of Islam by
not recognizing the basis of the rule of Islam,
and claim that “obeying the law of Islam is not
compulsory on the State, rather it is only
compulsory on the people (as individuals), who
chose this religion”, then this is kufr.
This is, in theory and in fact, the act of
separating the Deen from the State, from the
scientific (Ilmi) and dogmatic (Aqidah) points of
view. Thus the State has gone out of the fold of
Islam (Riddat). With it, the citizenry, becomes
Murtaddeen if they are pleased with this
government.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
9
Furthermore, not rejecting it when they should,
is also being pleased with it, hence it is also
Riddat. If the State is ruled by a parliamentary
system where the citizens are making laws by
means of representation (wakaalat, deputies),
then this Aayat of the Qur‟an will apply to them:
“And those who do not judge by what Allah has
revealed
are
indeed
the
disbelievers
(kaafiroon).” v.44 s. ” المائدة 5
“The meaning of laic secularism is: the Muslim‟s
State becomes free of Islam and becomes free
from the rule of Islam. Thus its Riddat is
confirmed. In the same way, by choosing a
government opposed to Islam, specifically a
State built on a parliamentary system, the
citizens become free of Islam (Murtadd). Such
action renders the government and the citizenry
Murtadd. ”
“ A political system that approves of Laic
secularism has revolted against Islam‟s rule.
Thus,
first
the
government
will
become
Murtadd, then one by one, the citizens obeying
this government‟s law will become Murtadd
individually. Just as the government officials and
workers are individually Murtadd, so are the
masses that obey this government, Murtadd.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
10
Nothing more horrific than this shortcut to
collective Riddat can be imagined.
If any individual from us, denies even a single of
the rules of Islam, or refuses the
authority of the religion, or denies one of the
Halaal or Haraam obligations or prohibitions, he
becomes Murtadd. So, what is the fatwa
concerning the ones working for a government
that totally refutes the authority of Allah Azza wa
Jall,
that
refuse
his
rules
pertaining
to
obligations, prohibitions, Halaal and Haraam?
He is a Murtadd without any doubt.
Laic secularism has done far more damage to
Islam than other religions have done. ”
“If the people choose such a government
willingly and accept it, certainly they go out of
Islam (Riddat). The one having doubts about
this will also go out of Islam (Riddat). He will
become a Murtadd. If they don‟t make Tawbah
and don‟t return under the rule and authority of
the Deen, they will not be regarded as Muslims.
”
Mustafa Sabri Effendi was one of the last
Sheikhul Islams of Ottoman Khilafah.
Second Fatwa
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
11
* This fatwa was issued in the 1920's regarding
the government of M. Kemal the founder of the
Turkish republic and the Turkish people who
accepted this new rule.
" The leaders of the Turkish republic, are
endeavouring to destroy the foundation of the
clear Deen of Ahmed (Salla 'Allaho alayhi wa
sallam), since its inception, M. Kemal and his
friends, acted in opposition to the laws of the
Qur'an, rejected Allah Azza wa Jall and his Nabi
(Salla'Allahu alayhi wa sallam) and exiled the
Khalifah of Islam. Therefore, the destruction of
this anti- Shar'i government is Fardh on every
Muslim.
The lives and goods of the leaders of the
Republic and the people who submitted to the
republic are Halal according to the Shariah. "
Sheikh Muhammed Said Al Naqshbandi.
Third fatwa
The Egyptian Sheikh Omar Abdurrahman in his
book " أصنافالحكاموأحكامهم " (Types of rulers and
their ruling) that was written as a court defence
in his case after the killing of Anwar Sadat in the
1980's, clearly defines the different type of
rulers and their Hukm.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
12
" Summary of the views about the Ruler who
exchanges the Shariah of Allah‟s Azza with
man-made laws:
1. It is Kufr to change the Shariah a little or
more, by making Halaal into Haraam or Haraam
into Halaal, or by abandoning a part of Shariah,
or
by
changing
the
Shariah‟s
Code
of
punishment in whatever subject, in whatever
way, or under any affirmation.
And the worst way to exchange the Shariah of
Allah‟s Ta‟ala with man-made laws is for the
Ruler to change the basis of law-making by
formulating a constitution fabricated by men to
replace the Qur‟an and the Sunnah.
2. To rule using fabricated man-made laws is
Kufr without any doubt or ambiguity.
3. The Ruler who changes the laws of Allah
Azza wa Jall with man-made laws and governs
with them is Kaafir. It is Fardh to fight him until
he returns to the Shariah of Allah Azza wa Jall
and until he abandons man-made laws, or until
he is removed from office.”
He says that the voter and the elected are
equally Murtadd because they change the root
of the law and they expunge the Constitution of
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
13
the Qur‟an and the Sunnah. They declare
Haraam a Halaal and Halaal a Haraam or they
arrogate to themselves the right to decide if the
Shariah should be applied or not.
Fourth fatwa –
This fatwa was given in 1994 by Mufti
Cemaleddin Hocaoglu (Kaplan)
" Three groups of people are Mushrikeen:
1. The parliament members - all who are
members
of
the
majlis
of
shirk
as
representatives of the people are Mushrikeen
whoever they may be.
2. The person who votes for them, who goes to
the ballot box, who supports them with his
wealth, who campaigns for them -- every one of
them is Mushrik. They become Taghout. The
first group are Taghouts and those supporting
them are also Taghouts.
3. The person who does not regard as Mushrik
the first and second groups. If he says: 'How
can I say they are Mushriks? The fatwa
regarding them is not correct, hence I can't say
that they are Mushriks, then he is also a Mushrik
because he opposes the Law of Islam.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
14
Praying behind these three types of people is
not allowed and the Janaaza prayer should not
be performed on them if they died without
Tawba.
This fatwa is given and approved by all Ulamaa
of Haqq. "
Mufti Cemaleddin Hocaoglu (Kaplan)
Sources:
Tafseer of Imam Alusi, Tafseer of Qadi
Baydhawi, Shihaab, Muhammad Zahid al-
Kawthari, Sheikh Said Naqshbandi, Sheikhul
Islam Mustafa Sabri Efendi, Mufti of Komotini
Muhammed Nevzat, Hafeez Ali Rashad, Molla
Sadreddin Yüksel, Ebu Talal Kasimi.
All these Imams were from Ahlu-s Sunnah and
were either Ash'ari or Maturidi
The following fatwas were given by Salafi
Sheikhs. Although their Fatwa is the same, their
sources were not from Ahlu-s Sunnah but from
Ibni Taymiyyah and his student Ibni Qayyim.
Maybe this can be one of those Ijmaa subjects
for those Ulamaa who made the effort to learn
the true nature of democracy.
(End of the Turkish Brother‟s dissertation)
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
15
ALL SYSTEMS OF GOVERNMENT
OTHER THAN THE SHARIAH ARE
KUFR
“Those who do not govern according to that
(Shariah) which Allah has revealed,
indeed they are the kaafiroon.”
(Al-Maaidah, Aayat 44)
“Those who do not govern according to that
(Shariah) which Allah has revealed,
indeed they are the zaalimoon.”
(Al-Maaidah, Aayat 45)
“Those who do not govern according to that
(Shariah) which Allah has revealed,
indeed they are the faasiqoon.”
(Al-Maaidah, Aayat 47)
All systems of government such as democracy,
autocracy, communism, etc., etc. which are the
satanic excretions of the kuffaar – Yahood, Nasaara,
atheists, idolaters and the like, are undoubtedly kufr
and all those who subscribe to any such system of
law is undoubtedly kaafir and murtadd. They lose
their Imaan and their Nikah is nullified. If they desire
to return to the fold of Islam, renewal of Shahaadat
and Nikah is imperative.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
16
All governments and rulers in all Muslim lands are
kaafir and murtadd. There is no difficulty in
understanding this axiomatic truth. All of these
governments and rulers have abolished the Shariah in
entirety. Never can they be Muslim. It is correct that
anyone who believes them to be Muslim also
becomes a kaafir. Ridha bil kufr is also kufr. Being
pleased with or agreeing with kufr is undoubtedly
and unanimously kufr.
All those who support a kufr system in any way
whatsoever are kaafir and murtadd. Nowadays the
popular method of support for the murtadd regimes is
voting. Voting for a kuffaar government or for
kuffaar
candidates
or
for
so-called
Muslim
candidates is kufr. This applies to voting in kuffaar
and Muslim countries. While the governors in non-
Muslim countries are kuffaar, those in Muslim
countries are worse. They are murtaddeen who are
worse than born kaafireen.
A person who becomes a candidate for being a
potential legislator or a member of a kufr parliament
or any kufr system of law is a kaafir and murtadd.
Those voting for a kaafir/murtad also become kaafir
and murtadd since they are blatantly appointing a
kaafir/murtadd to represent them in the process of
kufr law-making and law administration.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
17
Most Ulama nowadays, even the sincere ones, are
dwelling in massive confusion and deception by
supporting so-called „Muslim‟ candidates in a system
of law which is kufr in entirety - a system which
abolishes the Shariah in entirety. In fact, many
molvis and sheikhs even go to the ballot to cast their
votes. What has happened to their brains? Their
obtund brains have become corrupted, putrefied and
kufrized. They are unable to apply their Aql because
they are driven on by the nafs and Iblees like cattle
and sheep.
In the words of the Qur‟aan Majeed: “They are like
animals or worse.” Just imagine Ulama going to the
polls to vote for a system of government which is the
very antithesis of Islam and the Law of Allah Azza
Wa Jal!!! They do so in blatant and direct conflict
with the Qur‟aanic and Hadith Nusoos prohibiting
Muslims from adopting and subscribing to kufr, fisq
and fujoor.
Voting for a candidate who will be a cog in the kufr
system of government is one‟s expression of pleasure
and agreement with the kufr system of government.
Such expression is kufr. Abstention from voting is
not a crime even in the kufr system. Hence, only
those who are kuffaar bootlickers and in entirety
ignorant of the Deen hasten to vote for Taaghoot.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
18
Those molvis and sheikhs who promote voting and
who vote for the system of Taaghoot should ponder
and reflect on the villainy of their kufr of nailing
their colours to the mast of kufr ideology whose
objective is the destruction of Islam. How can it ever
be permissible to appoint a Harbi to be one‟s
representative in the process of law-making?
Even senior and sincere Ulama being desensitized
intellectually as an effect of social assimilation have
become the victims of cognitive dissonance, hence
they conjectured baseless dalaa-il for permissibility
to vote for candidates who will become cogs in the
law-making machinery of Taaghoot. They come fully
within the purview of the Qur‟aanic stricture:
“Have you not seen those who imagine that they
believe in that (Deen) revealed to you (O
Muhammad!) and in that revealed before you? They
intend to gain judgement from Taaghoot whereas
they have been commanded to reject him. Shaitaan
plots to lead them astray into manifest deviation.”
(An-Nisaa, Aayat 60)
Those who profess to be Muslims but join the
Taaghooti system of government labour in self-
deception by entertaining the idea of themselves
being Muslim. It is not possible to be a Muslim, as
the aforementioned Aayat explicitly states, while
becoming a party to the law-making process of
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
19
Taaghoot or by supporting the system of Taaghoot or
by becoming pleased with the devil‟s system of
government. Participating in law-making in the
kuffaar system is in effect the abolition of the
Shariah.
Those who claim to be Muslims, but seek law and
judgement in the systems of the kuffaar are exactly
like the Yahood who despite claiming to be the
followers of the Taurah sought judgement elsewhere.
In regard to their kufr, the Qur‟aan Majeed states:
“How can they appoint you (O Muhammad!) as the
judge (to adjudicate) whilst they have the Tauraah by
them in which there is the law of Allah, then they
turn away from it. Indeed these people are not
Mu‟mineen.”
(Al-Maaidah, Aayat 43)
They are not Mu’mineen
In the same way, today Muslims who vote for the
law of Taaghoot, despite having the Qur‟aan and
Sunnah, are appointing and supporting the kuffaar
governing system by means of voting for it. Thus, in
terms of the Qur‟aan: “Indeed they are not
Mu‟mineen.”
So-called
Muslim
members
of
a
Taaghooti
parliament cannot decide in terms of the Shariah.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
20
They become part and parcel of the system of
Taaghoot. From beginning to end the entire system
of the government of a democracy or of any other
system is kufr. Never can it be permissible for a
Muslim to become a party to law-making in any
system of government.
The command of Allah Azza Wa Jal is to reject
Taaghoot and his system of government. Says the
Qur‟aan Majeed in this regard:
“Whoever rejects Taaghoot and believes (has Imaan)
in Allah, verily has taken hold of a powerful handle
which will not break (and on which he can cling).
Allah is All-Hearing, All-Knowing.”
(Al-Baqarah, Aayat 256)
Thus, the Mu‟min is required by Allah Ta‟ala to
reject Taaghoot and his systems of law. The Mu‟min
should
not
fabricate
arguments
to
justify
participation in the kufr systems of government in
vogue in the Muslim countries. The Urwah Wuthqa
(the Powerful Handle) is the Shariah – the Law of
Allah Azza Wa Jal. He must cling to him – hold on
to it with might to avoid drowning in the abyss of
kufr. Volitional acceptance of the law of Taaghoot or
being pleased with it is kufr which expels one from
the fold of Islam. It renders one a Murtadd.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
21
The Ummah’s solution is Inaabat Ilallaah
The solution for the ills, problems and humiliation of
Muslims is only Inaabat ilallaah - to turn unto Allah
Ta‟ala with repentance and renewing the Pledge of
Obedience, and that is to follow the Shariah and to
adopt the Sunnah. How is it possible and permissible
for Muslims to work in collusion with a Taaghooti
system which abolishes the Shariah of Allah Ta‟ala
in entirety? Complimenting those who rebuff the
system of Taaghoot, the Qur‟aan Majeed states:
“For those who refrain from worshipping Taaghoot
and they turn unto Allah (with Taubah), for them are
glad tidings. So, convey glad tidings to My slaves
who listen (and accept) and follow the Qawl (Law of
Allah – the Shariah). Indeed they are those whom
Allah has guided. They are the ones of intelligence)”
(Az-Zumar, Aayats 17 & 18)
Those who follow the law and system of Taaghoot
are the worshippers of Shaitaan. For them there is
nothing but ruin and destruction.
The deception of ‘benefits’
One argument the legalizers of voting for Taaghoot
have is that voting for a „pious‟ candidate is
beneficial. One view runs as follows:
“In a situation where there is no worthy candidate
(as in non-Muslim countries where at least the
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
22
ideologies and beliefs of the relevant parties are
contrary to the teachings of Shariah), then the vote
should be given to the one who is the better and more
trustworthy than other candidates.”
This view is absolutely corrupt. It lacks in even a
single valid daleel. It is Islamically incongruous and
in conflict with Imaani Aql and Naql. There is no
gainsaying that the ideologies and beliefs of kuffaar
are in violent conflict and rejection of Islam.
Assuming that a candidate is „trustworthy‟ (and this
is a stupid fiction of a mind which suffers from self-
imposed satanism), then too it will be haraam and
kufr to vote for him. This prohibition applies to all
countries, not to only non-Muslim countries.
All countries, kuffaar and Muslim alike, come under
the sway of the Prohibition because the constitutions
and law of all countries in this era are blatantly kufr
and in violent denial of the Qur‟aan and Sunnah.
Furthermore, a man who becomes a candidate in this
scenario can never be „trustworthy‟, leave alone
being a man of taqwa (piety). A man of taqwa flees
from corruption, fisq, fujoor and kufr which are the
dominating and inherent factors of kuffaar systems of
constitutions and governments. In fact, he flees from
leadership even in a perfect Darul Islam under the
domination of a genuine Khalifah.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
23
A man of Taqwa knows and understands that the
very first factor of disqualification for leadership is
application for a leadership post. In this regard
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:
“We do not appoint to a post of leadership anyone
who applies for it or desires it.”
A candidate seeking a post of leadership, and
especially in a kuffaar, anti-Islamic dispensation,
suffers from the disease of riya, takabbur, nafsaaniyat
and shaitaaniyat. Never can such a devil-incarnate be
„trustworthy‟ or pious. His beard and external
„islamic‟ appearance, donning headgear and kurtah
are deceptive.
The
Aql
of
the
legalizer
presenting
the
aforementioned view is in a state of disequilibrium
which stems from spiritual blindness, the blindness
about which the Qur‟aan Majeed says:
“The (physical) eyes are not blind. But the
hearts within the breasts are blind.”
The imaginary „trustworthy‟ man will be a cog in the
kufr machinery of law-making which churns out and
excretes copro-kufr laws in total rejection of the
Shariah. Voting for him is blatant acceptance of the
law of Taaghoot. There is no compulsion from the
government to force Muslims to vote, hence
abstention is Waajib. The principle of Dhuroorah
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
24
may not be invoked to justify and legalize kufr. In
this scenario there is no compulsion to consume pork
to save one‟s life.
Baseless interpretation of a Hadith is a lie
attributed to Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radhiyallahu
anhu)
One molvi committing a major gaffe stated in his
argument of voting being „fardh‟: “Sayyiduna Abu
Bakr (ra) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (saw)
said: „If people see an oppressor and don‟t prevent
him, then it is very likely that Allah will include all of
them in the punishment.”
(The corrupt abbreviations of „ra‟ and „saw‟ are of
the legalizing molvi.)
This averment is stunningly damnable. It is pure
stupid twaddle. How can the punishment of Allah
Ta‟ala settle on those who uphold the Shariah, who
abstain from supporting kufr, who reject the law and
system of Taaghoot as commanded in the Qur‟aan,
and who oppose a satanic system of law which
embraces and imposes on the population every act of
shaitaan? There is absolutely no relationship between
the Hadith cited and support for the law of Taaghoot.
Voting for a candidate in a kufr dispensation is
simply nothing other than acceptance and support for
a satanically diabolical system which is in diametric
opposition and denial of the System of Allah Ta‟ala,
the Shariah.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
25
Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radhiyallahu anhu) embarked on
Jihad against a system which denied only Zakaat
while submitting to the entire Shariah. That system
did not deny the Shariah. It only refuted the
compulsory obligation of Zakaat. On the basis of
only this single denial did the Khalifah Abu Bakr
(Radhiyallahu anhu) issue the fatwa of kufr and
resolved to wage Jihad against the proponents of the
new ideology. What then would have been his
attitude towards a full system of Taaghoot which
denies every belief, every teaching, every tenet of
Islam? The chap who sought to legalize the kufr of
voting with the narration of Hadhrat Abu Bakr
(Radhiyallahu anhu) suffers from some mental
dissonance,
hence
his
absolutely
untenable
misguided „daleel‟.
Mufti Taqi Usmaani
Mufti Taqi should never be proffered in vindication
of any claim. He has lost the Path. He has bartered
away his soul for the dunya. His flapdoodle
arguments are generally the effects of liberalism
which has despoiled his thinking. Consorting with
the kuffaar capitalist riba banks has rendered him
persona non grata. Just write him off.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
26
The Nadwah molvi Sajjad
The legalizer of kufr voting cites the following
statement of some Maulana Sajjad Nomani of
Nadwah:
“All efforts should be made, bearing in mind the
political situation of a particular country, to ensure
full participation in the political process. This is an
absolute necessity.”
Did this Molvi from Nadwah perhaps receive some
wahi to enable him to claim qat‟iyat (absolute
necessity) for the grossly stupid baatil avernment he
has so ignorantly disgorged? His idea is shaitaani
ilhaam. On what Shar‟i basis can he posit the claim
of qat‟iyat for participating in a political dispensation
which is 100% kufr, 100% inimical to Islam and
100% the product of Taaghoot? This type of molvi is
among the Signs of the Impending Hour of
Qiyaamah. His claim is pure bunkum.
Being welded to the dunya, he fails to understand the
Qur‟aanic solution for the Ummah‟s problems, hence
he has proffered his flaccid, drivel and haraam idea.
He appears to be a bootlicker of the Yahood and
Nasaara.
All those who proffer arguments for participation in
kuffaar politics and for voting lack mental
perspicacity. They fail to present any valid Shar‟i
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
27
daleel. They have neither Aqli nor Naqli daleel for
their
flapdoodle
claims.
They
make
foolish
statements without any Shar‟i basis. With their
twaddle they twiddle with the Deen.
The Obligation of the Mufti
It is lamentably shocking that supposedly senior
Ulama and Muftis have demonstrated breath taking
ignorance of the kufr political system into which they
seek to lure and ensnare the Ummah with their
figments of imagination. The obligation of the Mufti
is to guide Muslims to the Shariah – to the Qur‟aan
and Sunnah – to encourage and induce Muslims to
adopt the prescriptions of the Qur‟aan and Sunnah
for the resolution of their problems. It is never the
function of the Ulama to deflect the masses from the
Shariah and to cast their thinking in the mould
presented by the kuffaar. Our succour is in
submission to the Shariah, not in bootlicking the
kuffaar by becoming their obsequious serfs seeing
success in the adoption of their systems of kufr.
Specifically for these types of miscreant molvis and
sheikhs who have fallen by the wayside in the wake
of their deflection from Siraatul Mustaqeem, the
Qur‟aan Majeed states:
“What! Do you seek a way other than the Deen of
Allah whilst the heavens and the earth have
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
28
submitted to Him willingly and unwillingly, and unto
Him shall they be returned.”
(Aal-e-Imraan, Aayat 83)
Only the Shariah is the Criterion
The Nusoos commanding obedience to only the
Shariah are numerous and explicit. Despite this, the
Ulama of this era due to their frolick with the
kuffaar, present flagrant gaffs and blunders on the
basis of blatant misinterpretation of Aayaat and
Ahaadith. Their attempt to sustain their bootlicking
with a hue of Shar‟i credibility is a disingenuous
demonstration of intellectual miscegenation which
gives rise to a hybrid „shariah‟ about which the
Qur‟aan Majeed states:
“What! Do you believe in a portion of the Kitaab and
commit kufr with a portion? The compensation for
those among you who do so is only humiliation in
this worldly life, and on the Day of Qiyaamah they
shall be driven to the severest punishment.”
(Al-Baqarah, Aayat 85)
The Shariah is the Qur‟aan and the Sunnah. Any act
which is in conflict with the Shariah must be
incumbently rejected. Such acts may not be
incorporated into the Shariah by way of baatil
ta‟weel. Every interpretation of the Nusoos proffered
by the promoters of participation in Taaghooti
politics, is haraam misinterpretation which has no
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
29
validity in the Shariah. Figments of imagination,
whim and fancy are presented by the miscreant and
wayward muftis in support of voting for Taaghoot.
Bootlicking the Kuffaar
Regardless of the efforts by Muslims to placate and
appease the kuffaar by submitting to their dictates,
the humiliation of Muslims in this world is
incremental. No amount of bootlicking will efface
the disgrace Muslims are suffering at the boots of the
kuffaar whom they have appointed to be their
masters and leaders. This incremental disgrace
suffered by Muslims is the Khizyun fil hayaatid
dunya mentioned in the above cited Aayat.
Currently in Sri Lanka, the molvis are ensnaring and
goading the Muslims
masses into the
kufr
participation of the politics of the Buddhist
mushrikeen. They have excreted to Muslims that it is
fardh to vote for the Buddhist Taaghoot, the enemy
of Islam, the enemy of Allah Ta‟ala, the enemy of
the Ummah. Muslims have sunk to disgraceful levels
of bootlicking to appease the Buddhist idolaters.
Bereft of fear for Allah Ta‟ala, Muslims see no way
for their safety other than bootlicking the Buddhist
mushrikeen, hence they have elevated voting for the
mushrik Taaghoot to the level of Fardh Salaat.
All of these vile molvis have become murtadd.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
30
GHUTHAA – Rubbish!
Muslims have become the RUBBISH (Ghutha)
which Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had
predicted. In this regard, our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi
wasallam) said that an era will dawn when the
kuffaar will form coalitions to swallow and eliminate
the Ummah. The Sahaabah, immensely surprised
asked: “Will it be because of the paucity of our
numbers?” Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam)
responded:
“On the contrary, you (Muslims) will be abundant,
but you will be RUBBISH (GHUTHA) such as the
flotsam of floodwaters. Allah will eliminate fear for
you from the hearts of your enemy, and He will cast
wahan in your hearts.” They asked: „O Rasulullah!
What is wahan?‟
He replied: “Love for the dunya and aversion for
Maut.”
With all their scrap and stupid advices the molvis and
sheikhs of our time are perpetuating this Wahan.
Their deflection from the Shariah has severely
stunted their brains, hence they are capable of only
proffering bootlicking as the solution for the disasters
which are destroying this Ummah. The ruin of the
Ummah in all countries has continued unabated in a
downward sinking in the quagmire of misery and
humiliation despite having employed all the
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
31
bootlicking concepts and methods of the kuffaar
promoted by molvis, sheikhs and other zindeeq self-
appointed reformers of the Ummah.
The chimera of ‘basic necessities’
Some morons state with extreme stupidity that
Muslims should vote to “secure adequate delivery of
day to day basic necessities and to secure Islamic
rights and the freedom to practice on them”. These
morons suffer from satanic derangement of the
brains.
The governments and municipalities have their
obligations to discharge in terms of their constitution
and laws. Islam has no say in terms of the satanic
constitution governing the laws of countries. There is
no such thing as observation of „Islamic‟ rights in
this world of this era. The only rights Muslims have
are rights granted by the kufr constitution - rights
which apply uniformly to all citizens. There is no
special treatment for Muslims. On the contrary,
Islamic rights are suppressed and denied.
Regardless of the shayaateenul ins (human devils) of
whatever persuasion they be, who are voted in, the
supreme satanic idol of worship remains the kufr
constitution and the laws arising therefrom. Thus,
voting for a kufr system is to vote for Taaghoot
which the Qur‟aan vehemently prohibits.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
32
Religious freedom under Taaghoot is a mirage
In every country, notwithstanding the Muslim vote,
Muslims are increasingly experiencing erosion of the
little religious freedom they are able to eke out from
the laws of Taaghoot. Consider the UK, U.S.A. etc.
where Muslims fully participate in the kufr political
system of these countries. Despite this fact, a Muslim
in the U.K is liable to lose his children if he opens his
mouth against homosexuality. He is liable to be
imprisoned and his children removed to some devil‟s
home for kufr caring and for destruction of their
Imaan.
It is the same here in South Africa. With each new
election in which more and more misguided kuffaar
bootlicking Muslims participate, Islamic rights are
extinguished and obscene and immoral kufr laws are
imposed. Despite the presence of many „Muslims‟ in
all tiers of government, from parliament downward,
Islamic rights are incrementally suffering and being
denied while not one of these bootlicking so-called
„Muslim‟ parliamentarians, etc. has the courage to
open his mouth even feebly in argument for Muslim
religious rights. They are simply a putrid lot of scrap
on a pile of festering manure, viz. the parliament of
Taaghoot.
Understand well, and do not be fooled by Iblees, that
all politicians of whatever hue, persuasion, ideology
or religion, are vile spectres of crass lust. They are
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
33
copro-worms and decadent infosoria. There is no
goodness in these vile rubbishes who are in
government to loot the public treasury and to
suppress and oppress the citizens. No man of Taqwa
will become a candidate in a pure Taaghooti system.
And, assuming and imagining that he is a man of
Taqwa, then too it will be kufr to vote for him
because he will have to act and dance to the tune of
Taaghoot. His „taqwa‟ will be an external, excrescent
bait to befuddle and ensnare moron Muslims into the
trap of Taaghoot.
The muftis who halaalize participation in kufr
politics and voting for Taaghooti personalities only
spin the Qur‟aanic Aayaat and Ahaadith to conform
to their preconceived idea of permissibility to
participate in the system of Taaghoot. They disgorge
figments of whim and fancy totally devoid of Shar‟i
substance. Allah Ta‟ala is totally excised from the
equation. Maut, Qabar and Qiyaamah are the furthest
from the minds of those who extravasate jawaaz for
voting for a Taaghooti system. Their extrapolation of
jawaaz from the Nusoos is the effect of nafsaaniyat.
Furthermore, regarding the issue of securing „Islamic
rights‟, this is a fiction dangled as a chimera to
hoodwink stupid Muslims and to encourage them to
vote for Taaghoot. What are these imaginary
„islamic‟ rights which Taaghoot will grant Muslims
who vote for him? The Islamic rights Muslims so far
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
34
have living under Taaghoot, are restricted to prayers,
paying Zakaat, performing Hajj and a smattering of
other rituals and practices. But even these are
required to conform to the kufr laws.
Muslims of this era do not want the Shariah
Islamic practices which are in conflict with the kufr
constitution remain unlawful under the dispensation
of Taaghoot. In fact, Muslims themselves by far and
large, have abandoned the Shariah even in issues and
practices which are allowed by Taaghoot‟s law.
The Shariah‟s ahkaam of Miraath, Hijaab, Salaat and
a range of other issues are flouted and abandoned by
Muslims. The vast majority does not perform Salaat
with Jamaat regularly and punctually. Muslims
indulge in Riba dealings, haraam photography,
videoing, pornography, gambling, etc., etc.
The wills of most Muslims are in diametric conflict
with
the
Shariah.
Muslim
women
prostitute
themselves in a variety of ways. Driving cars has
become a norm for Muslim women. Most Muslim
women have adopted the nude ways and styles of the
kuffaar. They are not interested in Islamic rights.
They avail themselves of Taaghoot‟s law when they
are divorced. They are dissatisfied of the Shariahs
laws pertaining to marriage, divorce, custody, etc.,
hence they rebelliously proceed to the courts of
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
35
Taaghoot to gain resolution in terms of Shaitaan‟s
law, and confound the Shariah!
In brief, Muslims themselves are grossly neglectful,
unmindful and even inimical of the Ahkaam of the
Shariah. They even rebel against the Shariah.
Thus, the talk about securing „islamic‟ rights from
Taaghoot by voting for him is a lot of hogwash,
primarily the effect of nifaaq.
The murtadd ‘Muslim’ candidates of Taaghoot
So-called „Muslim‟ candidates for whom Muslims
have voted are so spineless and hopeless that they are
unable to secure exemptions for Muslim children
who are required to study all the pornographic filth
which has become compulsory in the kufr
educational
dispensation
of
Taaghoot.
These
miserable „Muslim‟ members of parliament are so
awed and scared of their kuffaar counterparts that
their brains and lips become sealed. They do not
even make feeble squealing noises against blatantly
haraam and kufr laws which Muslims have to submit
to. On the contrary they are obliged to support and
vote in the baboonic parliament for all the kufr and
filth of the party to which they have offered
allegiance. Thus the chimera of „islamic rights‟ is a
big, stupid, satanic LIE. It is deception to hoodwink
the stupid Muslim laity into the snare of voting for
Taaghoot.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
36
Mufti Mahmood Hasan Gangohi (Rahmatullah
alayh)
The promoters of voting for Taaghoot cite in their
support Mufti Mahmood Hasan who stated:
“If by voting there is some benefit to the Deen,
nation and country and it is strongly hoped that the
party or candidate voted to power will render correct
service, then one should vote.”
This advice is in reality meaningless. It is far, very
far off the mark. The goals mentioned in it are
meaningless and fictitious. In everything on earth
there is some benefit and harm. The Qur‟aan Majeed
confirms „many benefits‟ in gambling and wine.
Despite the benefits, the overwhelming harms render
these acts haraam. While wine and gambling have
“many benefits”, voting for Taaghoot is devoid of
benefit. Assuming there is some benefit, the huge
harms outweigh the little and “the some benefit”,
hence it will not be permissible to vote for a kuffaar
system of law which the Qur‟aan says is the law of
Taaghoot (Shaitaan).
Whatever benefit there is for the nation and the
country governed by Taaghoot will be in terms of the
constitution and laws of Taaghoot, hence regardless
of Muslims voting, the equation will not change. On
the contrary, the Imaan of Muslims will change for
the worse. They will be appointing someone to
represent them in the kufr process of Taaghoot‟s law.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
37
Hadhrat Mahmood Hasan‟s advice is based on
imagination . It is unrelated to reality. It is wishful
thinking.
None of the muftis who promote voting for Taaghoot
has proffered even a single valid Shar‟i daleel for
halaalizing the blatant kufr act of supporting the law
of Taaghoot with voting for someone who will be an
integral cog in the law-making process of Taaghoot.
Even kuffaar do not vote for their own
Taaghooti system
Furthermore, why should Muslims ever vote for the
system of Taaghoot when millions of kuffaar
themselves abstain from voting? It is indeed
lamentable that Muslims who claim to be adherents
of Islam which is the antithesis of the law of
Taaghhoot, vote for Shaitaan while millions of
kuffaar who follow Shaitaan abstain from voting for
Taaghoot.
There are about 27 million registered voters in South
Africa. In the last general elections (2019) 17 million
(about 66%) voted. In the United States there are 240
million registered voters. 159 million voted. This too
is about 66%. In the cow and idol worshipping India
there are 911 million registered voters. 613 million
(67%) voted.
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
38
Now when hundreds of millions of kuffaar do not
vote, what constrains Muslims to vote for a 100%
Taaghooti system? All Muslim promoters of voting
are bootlickers of the kuffaar.
No compulsion to vote
The governments following the systems of Taaghoot
do not compel the citizens to vote. It is astounding
that although the kuffaar have not promulgated
voting to be incumbent, muftis who are supposed to
guide Muslims to the Path of Allah Ta‟ala, have
elevated voting for Taaghoot to the status of Fardh
thereby equating it with the status of Fardh Salaat.
They are absolutely shameless in promoting support
for the systems of Taaghoot in flagrant defiance of
the Qur‟aan and Sunnah.
The only motive for voting for the law of Taaghoot is
bootlicking, name, fame and the haraam monetary
gains which all political candidates, without
exception, pursue. The message of the Qur‟aan
Majeed for these bootlickers is:
“Do they search for Izzat (honour) from them
(the kuffaar)? Verily, all Izzat belongs to Allah.”
(An-Nisaa, Aayat 139)
Therefore, if they are Muslims, they should
understand:
“Whoever desires Izzat, should (know) that All Izzat
is only for Allah.”
(Faatir, Aayat 10)
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
39
There is no honour, no respect and no aid in
bootlicking the kuffaar.
OUR PREVIOUS STANCE
For decades have we been criticizing participation in
kufr politics, voting and the like. We have
vehemently and vigorously proclaimed the Hurmat
of kufr politics. However, we had not resorted to
takfeer. We had displayed hesitancy in the matter of
takfeer. The only factor underlying our hesitancy was
that some very senior Ulama who are Ulama-e-Haqq
condoned voting for candidates regardless of the
system being Taaghooti.
Our hesitation in fact was of concern to us. Greater
research and deeper reflection have convinced us of
the kufr of voting for candidates in the kufr system
regardless of the assumed or imagined benefits on
which the senior Ulama had based their fatwa of
permissibility.
We are in full agreement with the Fatwa of Kufr
issued by the Turkish Ulama of Haqq. Our view has
gravitated
from
hurmat
to
kufr.
We
now
unequivocally say that it is kufr to vote for kufr law.
Voting for candidates who will be cogs in the law-
making process of Taaghoot is kufr. It is blatant
? VOTING BECOMING A MURTADD
40
support for a shaitaani system which is the very
antithesis of the Shariah of Allah Ta‟ala.
The solution for Muslims is not in the system of
Taaghoot. Our success, honour and victory are in
only the Deen of Allah Ta‟ala – the Sunnah and the
Shariah. Muslims have to resort to Inaabat ilallah,
i.e. turn unto Allah Ta‟ala with repentance, renew the
pledge of obedience, adopt the Sunnah, follow the
Shariah, and make Sabr and Dua. Then will Allah
Ta‟ala turn the tables.
“Those who do not govern according to that
(Shariah) which Allah has revealed, indeed they are
the kaafiroon.” (Al-Maaidah, Aayat 44)
“Those who do not govern according to that
(Shariah) which Allah has revealed, indeed they are
the zaalimoon.” (Al-Maaidah, Aayat 45)
“Those who do not govern according to that
(Shariah) which Allah has revealed, indeed they are
the faasiqoon.” (Al-Maaidah, Aayat 47)
SALAAM ON THOSE WHO FOLLOW THE
GUIDANCE OF ALLAH TA’ALA